Fiber Guide · B2B Sourcing · Data-Driven

Tencel (Lyocell) Yarn for
Sustainable Fashion.

TENCEL™ Lyocell is the closest thing the sustainable fashion industry has to a fibre with its claims fully verified.

A comprehensive breakdown for sourcing teams.

Get Sourcing Advice →

Free consultation · Data-driven recommendations

Technical Details

Manufacturing specifications.

Decision-grade specs for Tencel (Lyocell) in Sustainable Fashion. Open each block for the numbers, process constraints, and sourcing details that matter before production.

4 sections

26 checkpoints

Quick Read

First-pass technical cues

GSM Range

Lightweight summer pieces (shirts, dresses, blouses): 110–145 GSM

Yarn Count

Fine woven garments (shirts, dresses): 60s–80s Ne combed

Knit Construction

Single jersey: Standard for T-shirts, tops, and lightweight dresses. Best for showcasing TENCEL™'s drape. Low GSM single jersey (120–140 GSM) requires care in cutting to avoid distortion.

Shrinkage

First industrial wash at 40°C: 3–5% length, 2–3% width. Brands making wash-care claims should specify pre-shrinkage (sanforisation or pre-washing in finishing) to reduce residual shrinkage to under 1.5%. For sustainable fashion brands using cold-wash recommendations, pattern allowance of 4% minimum is sufficient.

GSM Range

• Lightweight summer pieces (shirts, dresses, blouses): 110–145 GSM • Core range (T-shirts, casual tops, shorts): 145–175 GSM • Mid-weight transition pieces (layering, light trousers): 175–220 GSM • Heavier statement pieces (unstructured jackets, wide-leg trousers): 220–280 GSM For sustainable fashion collections aiming to minimise material use (a valid sustainability principle), 130–155 GSM in quality woven constructions is the viable range — sufficient fabric integrity without excess weight.

Yarn Count

• Fine woven garments (shirts, dresses): 60s–80s Ne combed • Knit range (T-shirts, casual tops): 40s–60s Ne ring-spun or compact-spun • Heavier casual knits, loungewear crossover: 30s–40s Ne Compact spinning reduces yarn hairiness by 40–50% versus conventional ring spinning and reduces pilling initiation — worth specifying for sustainable fashion brands where garment longevity is a brand promise.

Knit Construction

• Single jersey: Standard for T-shirts, tops, and lightweight dresses. Best for showcasing TENCEL™'s drape. Low GSM single jersey (120–140 GSM) requires care in cutting to avoid distortion. • Interlock: Suitable for more structured sustainable pieces; dimensional stability is better than single jersey, and the tighter construction reduces fibrillation risk. • Woven plain weave and twill: Preferred for shirting, dresses, and trousers in sustainable fashion. Woven construction handles the low-stretch character of TENCEL™ better than bias-cut knit constructions. • Terry and french terry: Growing category for sustainable loungewear-adjacent pieces; TENCEL™ terry at 280–320 GSM performs well.

Shrinkage

First industrial wash at 40°C: 3–5% length, 2–3% width. Brands making wash-care claims should specify pre-shrinkage (sanforisation or pre-washing in finishing) to reduce residual shrinkage to under 1.5%. For sustainable fashion brands using cold-wash recommendations, pattern allowance of 4% minimum is sufficient.

Pilling Resistance

Grade 3–4 (ISO 12945-1 Martindale method) for pure TENCEL™ Lyocell without enzyme finishing. Post bio-polishing improves this to grade 4–4.5. Blending 15–20% modal increases pilling resistance to grade 4.5–5 with minimal impact on sustainability profile.

Colorfastness

• Wash (ISO 105-C06): Grade 4–5 • Light (ISO 105-B02): Grade 4–5 • Dry rubbing (ISO 105-X12): Grade 4–5 • Wet rubbing: Grade 3–4 Note for sustainable fashion: AZO-free reactive dyes are fully compatible with TENCEL™ Lyocell and should be standard spec. Low-liquor-ratio dyeing (LLR) reduces water and energy use further, compatible with TENCEL™ Lyocell's dye uptake profile.

Tensile Strength

• Dry: 34–38 cN/tex • Wet: 34–38 cN/tex (near-full wet strength retention — key differentiator from viscose and bamboo viscose)

MOQ Guidance

• Yarn: 500–1,000 kg per count/colour from Lenzing-licensed Indian spinners • Fabric: 1,000–2,000 metres per colour per construction (standard); 500–800 metres possible at specialty sustainable mills with development premium • Finished garments: 300–500 pieces per style per colour at specialist sustainable factories; mainstream CMT requires 1,000+

Honest Assessment

Every fibre has limits. Here's the full picture.

Every fibre has limits. Here's the full picture.

Strength

+

Verifiable closed-loop chemistry

: The 99.7% solvent recovery rate is not a corporate claim — it's audited by EU Ecolabel certification bodies. Sustainable fashion brands can cite this figure in marketing with third-party backing, which is increasingly important under EU Green Claims Directive scrutiny.

Limitation

Zero inherent stretch — design constraints

: TENCEL™ Lyocell has approximately 14–16% elongation at break and near-zero elastic recovery. Sustainable fashion collections requiring body-conscious fit, active silhouettes, or any stretch-dependent style must add elastane, which breaks biodegradability. This is a genuine design constraint that should be resolved at the product development stage, not the sourcing stage.

Strength

+

FSC-certified raw material with measurable land efficiency

: Eucalyptus wood pulp from FSC-certified forests provides a raw material story that conventional cotton, wool, and silk cannot match for environmental defensibility. The 10–20x water use reduction versus cotton is a compelling data point for water-stressed market narratives.

Limitation

Higher cost than bamboo viscose competitors with similar marketing positioning

: Bamboo viscose is frequently marketed with similar sustainability language to TENCEL™ Lyocell but at 15–30% lower yarn cost. The key difference: bamboo viscose is mostly produced via conventional viscose chemistry with the environmental issues that entails. TENCEL™ Lyocell's higher cost reflects genuinely better production credentials. Sustainable fashion brands need to be prepared to defend the price premium if buyers compare TENCEL™ to bamboo fabrics.

Strength

+

Full biodegradability (pure form)

: EN 13432-certified compostable. No microplastic shedding. End-of-life story is genuinely clean for unblended garments — a meaningful differentiator as EPR regulations expand globally.

Limitation

Pilling without enzyme finishing — supply chain dependency

: The fibrillation risk is real and entirely avoidable but requires a manufacturing step that some lower-tier factories omit or under-dose. For sustainable fashion brands often working at lower MOQs with smaller factories, verifying this process step is critical. One bad batch of poorly finished TENCEL™ can damage a brand's quality reputation despite the issue being fixable.

Strength

+

Strong tactile quality supporting premium sustainable positioning

: The silk-like drape and hand feel support RSP of ₹1,500–5,000+ for T-shirts and casual pieces, which is where sustainable fashion brands need to price to achieve viable margins given higher production costs.

Limitation

Energy-intensive production process

: The NMMO solvent system, while environmentally superior to viscose, is an industrial process requiring significant energy inputs. Published carbon footprint data of 2.0 kg CO₂e/kg is competitive but not zero. Brands making carbon-neutral claims must account for scope 3 emissions including fibre production — renewable energy at manufacturing facilities is the primary mitigation lever.

Strength

+

TENCEL™ brand recognition building consumer trust

: Pre-existing consumer awareness reduces the education burden for sustainable fashion startups. Hang tags with the TENCEL™ logo are a purchase trigger among the target demographic.

Strength

+

AZO-free reactive dye compatibility with colour depth

: Low-impact dye processes are fully compatible without sacrificing the colour vibrancy that drives premium sustainable fashion aesthetics.

Common Questions

Tencel (Lyocell) for Sustainable Fashion — answered.

TENCEL™ for Sustainable Fashion — answered.

Organic cotton has a strong consumer story and familiar fibre character (cotton feel, durability, stretch in jersey). TENCEL™ Lyocell wins on water footprint (30 vs 1,500+ litres/kg), carbon footprint, and end-of-life biodegradability in both soil and marine environments. Organic cotton's durability through repeat washing is higher, and pilling is less of a concern. For sustainable fashion brands where the environmental narrative is the primary differentiator, TENCEL™ Lyocell makes stronger, more specific environmental claims. For brands where comfort familiarity and perceived naturalness drive purchase, organic cotton is easier to communicate. Many sustainable fashion leaders blend both — 50/50 TENCEL™/organic cotton delivers a balanced story.

More Resources

Explore adjacent fibres, applications, and technical terms.

Experience It

The difference isn't marketing.
It's in the fibre.

One wash cycle won't tell you. Thirty will.

Free sourcing consultation · Data-driven recommendations · No obligation

Ask about Tencel (Lyocell)

Available for B2B sourcing consultations